Wednesday 24 June 2015

Revisiting ‘Guru- Sishya Parampara’: The Modern Indian Context

Probably the first thought that comes to our mind when we think of the Guru-Sishya Parampara is the picturesque scenes of old Gurukuls, where the sacred art of warfare and education was taught by the sages (Gurus) to the extremely talented young students (Sishyas). Remember, this is the same tradition which has produced legends like Lord Ram, Arjun, Bheem, Mira Bai, the great Emperor Akbar and Eklavya, to name a few. The word Guru is derived from Sanskrit, where ‘Gu’, means darkness (Ignorance) and ‘Ru’ means the one who removes darkness. So, Guru is someone who removes the darkness of ignorance. The beginning of Guru-Sisya Parampara in India dates back to 2000 BC, starting with the oral teaching of the Upanishads.

In ancient world the Guru-Sishya Parampara was considered the most sacred and purest form of relationship which was firmly based on the foundation of ‘Trust’, ‘Devotion’ and ‘Respect’. The Sishya would literally surrender himself to his Guru to let him mold his life the way he deemed fit. If we broadly disintegrate the process of this tradition, we will notice the first step was the careful selection of the disciples by the Guru based on their will, potential and qualification. The second step was the rigorous training, the selected few would undergo, away from their homes and all materialistic comforts, in trying conditions, in the Gurukul under the watchful eyes of their Guru. The onus of setting the goals (Lakshya Nirdesa), teaching the basics, be it of the traditional warfare or of sacred scriptures, and of showing the right path when the disciple is in confusion, was on the Guru. Rest everything was the implicit responsibility of the Sishya. The amount of knowledge and skills to be imparted to each Sishya also varied based on the pre-assessment of the Sishya by the Guru, the deciding factor being the ability of the Sishya to grasp that knowledge and put it to good use. For example, although both Arjuna and Karna were the disciples of Guru Dronacharya but the art of obtaining and using Brahmastra was taught only to Arjuna, because he was better apt at controlling his anger and hence was less likely to misuse the power of Brahmastra. In return for his teachings, as Guru Dakshina, the Guru would only ask for a promise from the disciple that he will put the knowledge to good use and spread it when required.

 From then, the Guru-Sishya Parampara has travelled ages and changed various forms.  The first step of selection has now been replaced by entrance exams/tests and interviews. The Gurukuls themselves have been substituted by state of art humongous structures called schools and colleges where teachers (Gurus) impart knowledge to students (Sishya) in a much more comfortable environment, with mostly luxurious in-house facilities. Huge monetary fees’ being charged from students in return for the teachings has displaced the precious concept of Guru Dakshina. Although the basics of the tradition have remained almost unchanged but the real purpose of it seems to be lost somewhere in between. Nevertheless when the practice is followed strictly keeping in mind the originating basics, the outcome has been scintillating --eminent personalities like Ratan Tata, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, Madhuri Dikshit and Sachin Tendulkar, have time and again openly attributed the credit of their success to their mentors JRD Tata, Mahatma Gandhi, Saroj Khan and Ramakant Achrekar respectively. Modern Guru-Sishya parampara as Teacher-Student tradition has incorporated some positives also, like in ancient times Sishyas didn’t had the authority to question the teachings of Guru in any sense. As a result the Gurus were devoid of the opportunity to receive feedback and refine their teachings further. Going forward, another constructive development has been the transition from Student-Teacher relationship towards a more enabling Mentor-Mentee relationship. In this, as the role of the Mentor or Guru is modeled as more of a facilitator, in turn providing the Mentees or the Sishyas a better opportunity to evolve with much more freedom and openness, giving ample space to toy with budding creative ideas within the mind of the Mentees or the Sishyas. Although the presumption being that the zeal and self drive for continuous development and knowledge should come from within the Mentee. Hence, the learning so obtained through Mentor-Mentee relationship is much more valued both in proportion and quality as compared to any other earlier form.

Although still today there is no dearth of Sishya’s like Arjuna or Guru’s like Dronacharya but the delicate thread tying both of them together, of trust, devotion and respect needs to be carefully taken care of. At the same time the complete surrender of the Sishya needs to be appropriately balanced with the inherent curiosity to question and evolve the very basics which are being taught. Nevertheless the respect for Guru should never diminish. The transition towards a Mentor-Mentee relationship in this regard is quite promising but appears to be still in its nascent stage and needs to develop a lot further through experimentation and practice, before being universally accepted through out India. Till that time comes we are left with the present but unstable stage which amalgamates some concepts of the Guru-Sishya Parampara and some of the Teacher-Student tradition.

In the end it is important to reiterate the central idea with which we begun, that states a strong ‘bond’ between the Guru and the Sishya is indispensable as it enables the Guru to become a mentor who leads the Sishya from ignorance to wisdom, and enlightenment.
"Gurur Brahma, Gurur Vishnuh, Guru Dev, Maheswarah, Guru SakshatParabrahma, Tasmay Sree GuraveNamah"

Guru is Brahma, Vishnu and Mahesha, in fact Guru is, Prabrahma himself, the Brahman, the Absolute. Salutations to such Guru.

No comments:

Post a Comment